THROMBOTIC THROMBOCYTOPENIC PURPURA
SYNDROME
Valerie A. Lyons, M.D., Resident in Pathology
Joseph E. Kiss, M.D., Medical Director, Hemapheresis and Blood Services
INTRODUCTION
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a clinical syndrome which
consists of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and fever, along with a
variable degree of renal insufficiency and fluctuating neurologic abnormalities. Cases
with more pronounced renal involvement and little CNS findings are often referred to as
Hemolytic Uremia Syndrome (HUS). TTP occurs in a heterogeneous group of patients with an
increased incidence and association with pregnancy, autoimmune conditions, infections,
malignancy and certain medications. Historically, the mortality rate of TTP was in excess
of 95%. With increased awareness of symptomatology, understanding of pathophysiologic
mechanisms and treatment of milder forms of disease, today the mortality is less than 10%.1
Pathophysiology
The cardinal pathological finding in TTP is microvascular occlusion of
terminal arterioles and capillaries. The lesions consist predominantly of platelet
aggregates and von Willebrand Factor (vWF), without significant amounts of fibrin or
evidence of inflammation, unlike disseminated intravascular coagulation and vasculitis,
respectively. Passage of red blood cells through partially occluded vessels results in
fragmentation or the characteristic schistocyte. Under normal conditions, endothelial
cells release large vWF multimers into plasma. Plasma proteases cleave these large vWF
multimers into smaller multimers, which allow platelets to bind to subendothelium.
Unusually large vWF multimers are found in the plasma of patients with TTP, which have an
increased capacity to bind to platelets. The origin of these unusually large multimers is
unclear. It has been suggested that excessive release of vWF multimers from injured
endothelium overwhelms plasma proteases, resulting in abnormally large multimeric forms.
Direct platelet aggregation through GPIX and GPIIb-IIIa sites on platelets, may account
for the reversible formation of microthrombi which lodge in small vessels.1
These events help explain the transient neurologic manifestations of TTP.
Clinical manifestations
TTP remains a clinical diagnosis. No laboratory test or microscopic
examination is diagnostic. Many patients do not present with the classic pentad.
Acceptable guidelines for the initiation of therapy include thrombocytopenia and
microangiopathic hemolytic anemia unexplained by the patients underlying medical
condition. An increase in serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level and the presence of
schistocytes support the diagnosis of TTP. Schistocytes reflect an active microangiopathic
hemolytic process; however, a normal red blood cell morphology does not preclude therapy
in a symptomatic patient or a patient with a recent diagnosis of TTP. LDHs are cytoplasmic
enzymes that leak into the serum in response to cellular injury. LDH can be separated into
five different isoenzymes by appropriate electrophoretic techniques, with the
fraction of greatest mobility LDH1, found predominantly in myocardium and red blood cells.2
Although LDH is released from hemolyzed red blood cells in TTP, the major proportion in
blood is a result of tissue ischemia secondary to microvascular occlusion.
Clinical response to the management of TTP is dependent upon the
etiology, with cancer and chemotherapy-associated TTP being less responsive to
conventional therapy. No definitive predictors of relapse have been reported. However,
relapse seems to be most frequent within the first 60 days following the initiation of
treatment.3
Management
The mainstay of treatment is plasma exchange (PEX). This procedure is
thought to remove unusually large vWF multimers or replace deficient plasma proteases felt
to play a significant role in the etiology of TTP. Prompt initiation of PEX is essential
because TTP can be rapidly progressive and delay has been shown to correlate with the
likelihood of treatment failure.1 If delay is unavoidable, plasma infusion has
been shown to be of some benefit, but should not be considered an acceptable alternative.
Controversial issues surround the management of TTP, including the volume and type of
replacement fluid, duration of treatment, efficacy of concomitant drug therapy, and the
utility of tapering PEX after clinical stabilization.
Guidelines for the treatment of TTP generally include a 1-1.5 plasma
volume exchange using fresh frozen plasma (FFP) daily until resolution of clinical
symptoms and normalization or near-normalization of the platelet count and LDH level. Once
clinical remission is attained, tapering PEX to every other day for several days may be
beneficial in preventing relapse. Published estimates of relapse rates vary between
30-40%. A recent retrospective study found no statistical difference in the rate of
relapse when comparing taper to no-taper apheresis schedule. However, using a tapering
schedule for PEX, the relapse rate for patients treated by ITxM is approximately 20%.
Platelet transfusions are contraindicated because they exacerbate
platelet aggregation, causing microthrombi formation which may manifest as rapid clinical
deterioration. Serious hemorrhage is rare in TTP.4
FFP is standard replacement fluid for patients with TTP. A
virally-inactivated pooled-plasma product, solvent-detergent plasma, has been recently
approved by the Food & Drug Administration for this indication. Cryosupernatant, the
residual plasma fraction after separation of cryoprecipitate from FFP, has also been used
successfully as a replacement fluid, including cases which initially did not respond to
FFP. Replacement using non-plasma-derived fluids alone is not efficacious.
High doses of glucocorticoids have been shown to be of benefit in some
patients; however, prior to the induction of PEX, the response rate to glucocorticoids
alone was approximately 10%. Antiplatelet agents have not proved particularly beneficial
in the treatment of TTP. Recent reports have associated the use of the platelet inhibitor
ticlopidine with the development of TTP in patients undergoing coronary artery stenting or
for the treatment of stroke.5,6
Vincristine has been found to be beneficial as a second-line therapy.
Splenectomy is usually performed as salvage therapy for patients with chronic forms of
TTP, or persistent TTP refractory to plasma exchange.
Summary
Although the pathophysiology of TTP remains uncertain, increased
recognition and the use of intensive PEX has markedly improved the outlook for patients
with this enigmatic disorder.
References:
Schriber JR, Herzig GP. Transplantation
associated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome. Seminars
in Hematol 1997; 34:2: 126-33.
Pincus MR, Zimmerman HJ. Henry 1996; 19th Ed.: 281-9.
Bell WR, Braine HG, et al. Improved survival in thrombotic thrombocytopenic
purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome. NEJM 1991;325: 398-403.
Kwaan HC. Clinicopathologic features of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Sem In
Hemat 1987; 24:2:71-81.
Bennett CL, Weinburg PD, et al. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with
ticlopidine. Ann Int Med 1998;128: 541-4.
Bennett CL, Kiss JE, et al. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura after stenting and
ticlopidine. Lancet 1998; 352: 1036-7.
For questions regarding Thrombotic
Thrombocytopenic Purpura Syndrome, please contact Joseph E. Kiss, M.D.,
at (412) 209-7326, or by e-mail: jkiss@itxm.org
Copyright © 1998, Institute For Transfusion
Medicine
Copies of the Transfusion Medicine Update can be obtained by calling
Deborah Small at (412)209-7320; or by e-mail: dsmall@itxm.org
Visit our web page for information and previous issues of the TMU
newsletter at www.itxm.org
|