|
LDL APHERESIS: A New Treatment For Severe Dyslipidemia
Rama Shankar, M.D., Fellow
Joseph E. Kiss, M.D.,Medical Director Hemapheresis and Blood Services
What can transfusion medicine offer to patients
with hypercholesterolemia? Recent advances in affinity column technology now enable the
efficient removal of LDL-cholesterol directly from the bloodstream by apheresis. This new
therapeutic tool may reduce the risk of progressive atherosclerotic disease in
hypercholesterolemic patients who are resistant to diet and drugs.
Introduction:
Hypercholesterolemia is a well known major risk factor for
ischemic heart disease. Reduction in serum total cholesterol and the low-density
lipoprotein-fraction, LDL-C, has been conclusively shown in randomized, controlled
clinical trials to prevent the development and progression of atherosclerotic
cardiovascular disease.
Lipids are transported in different lipoprotein fractions in blood. The
protein moiety of the lipoprotein, apolipoprotein-B, and its degradation products,
are the atherogenic elements. The apolipoprotein-B is in highest concentration in LDL-C
and is present in smaller amounts in very low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (VLDL-C).
High-density cholesterol (HDL-C) levels lack the atherogenic apolipoprotein-B component
and relate inversely to coronary artery disease risk.
Familial hypercholesterolemia is an autosomal dominant disorder which
results from mutations involving the gene encoding the LDL receptor. The rare homozygous
form is characterized by premature atherosclerosis at a very young age (first 10 years of
life); myocardial infarction-related mortality usually occurs by the age of 25 years.
While not as severe, patients with the heterozygous form (frequency 1 in 500) are also at
high risk for premature atherosclerotic disease.
Adequate control of serum cholesterol levels is generally achieved by
dietary modifications and/or drug regimens, including HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, bile
acid binding resins, and nicotinic acid. However, a subset of patients, particularly those
with familial hypercholesterolemia, fail to respond. Additional treatment methods may be
necessary to reduce LDL-C to safer levels in these individuals who are at high risk for
atherosclerotic disease complications.
TECHNIQUE:
Two extracorporeal procedures, plasmapheresis and
LDL-apheresis, have been shown to be effective in lowering LDL-C. However, plasmapheresis
has the disadvantage of non-selective removal of all serum proteins including the
"protective" cholesterol-HDL-C. The LDL-apheresis procedure selectively removes
apolipoprotein-B containing cholesterol such as LDL-C and VLDL-C, sparing the HDL-C.
Several methods for LDL-apheresis have been developed. However, the
only device currently approved by the Food & Drug Administration is a dextran sulfate
adsorption system (Liposorber LA-15Ô , Kaneka America Corp.). This procedure acutely
lowers LDL, VLDL, and lipoprotein(a) levels by 60-70%. The time-averaged lowering of LDL
falls in the range of 40-60% depending on how often the treatment is performed (usually
every 1-2 weeks). A considerable degree of compliance on the part of the patient is
necessary, since long-term treatment is usually indicated.
Lipoprotein-apheresis is a safe and well tolerated procedure. As with
all apheresis procedures, adequate venous access is required. Complications are infrequent
and consist of hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, and headache.
CLINICAL RESULTS:
The efficacy of LDL-apheresis in lowering LDL-C and slowing the
rate of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease progression has been reported in a number
of trials:
The LDL-Apheresis Regression Study (LARS) involved 13 centers and
evaluated the effect of LDL-Apheresis on regression of coronary atherosclerosis.1
Coronary angiograms of 37 patients (7 homozygous FH, 25 heterozygous FH, and 5 non-FH)
treated with LDL-Apheresis were assessed. Twenty-nine patients received the lipid-lowering
drugs, Pravastatin or Probucol. All 37 patients underwent LDL-Apheresis for at least one
year at varying frequencies. The LDL-C level was reduced from a baseline of 500 mg/dl in
homozygous FH to 388 mg/dl pre-apheresis and 105 mg/dl post-apheresis (70% reduction). In
heterozygous FH the baseline LDL-C was 311 mg/dl, pre-apheresis level was 188 mg/dl and
post-apheresis level was 69 mg/dl (60% reduction). The evaluation of angiograms showed
regression of atherosclerosis in 14 of 37 patients.
The German Multicenter LDL-Apheresis Trial was a four-center
prospective study consisting of 32 FH patients (2 homozygous and 30 heterozygous).2
The average pre-apheresis LDL-C level was 249 mg/dl and was reduced to 83 mg/dl
post-apheresis (60% reduction). All patients showed symptomatic improvement of angina and
there was either no change or improvement in the stress test. Serial coronary angiograms
showed stabilization of lesions in 16 (50%) of the patients.
The FH Regression Study was a prospective randomized study, looking at
42 patients with heterozygous FH treated either with a lipid-lowering drug, simvastatin,
and biweekly LDL-Apheresis, or simvastatin and a resin for a period of 2 years.3
The time-averaged LDL-C levels were similar in the two groups, but the Lp(a) level was
reduced to 23% compared to a 22% increase in the drug-alone group. Evaluation of the
angiograms revealed no significant difference in the stenosis after 2 years of treatment
between apheresis and the drug group, either on per patient basis or on a per lesion
basis.
The Coronary Atheroma Regression Study (CARS), was a 20 patient,
randomized, angiographic trial. Patients received either drug or drug and apheresis.4
There was a 51% reduction in the LDL-C (244 mg/dl to 120 mg/dl) in the drug alone group
compared to a 74% reduction in the apheresis group. Improvement in exercise tolerance
occurred in both treatment groups but was statistically significant in the apheresis
group. No significant angiographic differences were noted.
SUMMARY:
Overall, these studies show that using LDL-apheresis can
achieve a substantial lipid lowering effect in all or nearly all patients with severe
hypercholesterolemia. The reduction was obtained regardless of prior response to dietary
and/or drug interventions. Also noted was a reduction in angina and stress test
improvement which did not correlate with the angiographic regression of the lesions. The
rationale for this observation may be the improvement in blood flow due to changes in
blood viscosity or blood vessel wall reactivity. While the clinical responses have been
quite favorable, long-term benefits such as a reduction in, or prevention of, coronary
heart disease have not been conclusively demonstrated.
LDL-apheresis appears to be a safe and effective treatment for patients
with hypercholesterolemia who are refractory to drug and/or dietary interventions. In
addition to patients with homozygous FH, the FDA recently approved LDL-apheresis use in
patients with coronary artery disease and LDL-C levels greater than 200 mg/dl. In patients
with no coronary artery disease, apheresis is recommended if the LDL-C level is ³ 300
mg/dl.
REFERENCES:
Kroon AA, et al. Circulation. 1996; 93:1826.
Borberg, H, et al. In: Agishi T, et al, eds. Therapeutic plasmapheresis (XII). VSP;
1993;
p. 13-20.
Thompson GR, et al. Lancet. 1995; 345:811.
Tait, GW, et al. In Gordon BR, Gotto AM Jr. Eds. The treatment of severe
hypercholesterolemia: can we impact disease course? Princeton: Excerpta Medica; 1992; p.
83-89.
For questions or additional information on LDL-apheresis, please contact
Dr. Joseph Kiss,
(412) 209-7326
Copies of the Transfusion Medicine Update can be obtained by
contacting
Deborah Small, (412)
209-7320.
|