HIV Therapy Monitoring
Hawazin Faruki, Dr. P.H., Scientific Director,
Molecular Diagnostics Reference Laboratory
INTRODUCTION
More than one million people in the United States and in excess of 14
million people worldwide are infected with the human immunodeficiency virus type 1
(HIV-1). Many of those infected are in an asymptomatic phase of the illness; this latent
period has a median duration of 10 years. However, with rare exceptions, all individuals
who are infected will ultimately develop a severe immunodeficiency which predisposes them
to both opportunistic infections and certain types of neoplasms.
Recent studies have shown that there is an intimate relationship
between viral burden and disease progression. The initial infection is usually associated
with a high level of viral replication; this occurs in both the blood and lymphoid
tissues. One consequence of this initial viremic state is the development of a
mononucleosis-like syndrome two-to-four weeks after initial infection. This viremic state
is generally of short duration. Specific cellular and humoral immune responses are
elicited which cause a dramatic reduction in the levels of free virus in the plasma.
Unfortunately, these immune responses are insufficient to completely control viral
replication. Recent studies suggest that there is continuous proliferation of virus,
particularly in lymph nodes. The continuous viral replication results in gradual damage to
the host's immune system as manifested by the progressive depletion of peripheral blood
CD4+ T cells. Once a critical threshold of immune system damage is reached,
usually a CD4+ cell count of less than 200/mm3, the individual
becomes highly vulnerable to opportunistic infections or development of neoplasms such as
Kaposi's sarcoma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Three drugs aimed at arresting HIV-1 replication, Zidovudine (AZT),
Didanosine (DDI), and Zalcitabine (DDC) have been approved for the treatment of HIV
infection. All three are inhibitors of the viral enzyme reverse transcriptase. This enzyme
serves to copy the viral RNA into DNA which is subsequently integrated into the cells own
DNA. Unfortunately, all three drugs are virostatic, not viricidal. A serious but common
problem associated with reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapies is the emergence of
drug-resistant isolates. Many other antiviral agents are currently under investigation
including other reverse transcriptase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, and inhibitors of
regulatory proteins such as TAT. Their long-term effectiveness is now being assessed.
The clinician treating an AIDS patient is faced with a number of
questions -- how to determine when therapy should be instituted, how to monitor its
effectiveness, and when to change therapies because of the emergence of drug-resistant
virus? Traditionally, both CD4+ cell counts and changes in the clinical status
have been used to monitor infected patients. Recent studies have questioned the adequacy
of these markers and suggest that viral markers may provide additional useful information.
IMMUNOLOGIC MARKERS
There is little doubt that the course of HIV
infection is associated with a progressive depletion of CD4+ cells. Absolute
CD4+ cell counts have been the most widely used clinical parameter for
monitoring HIV-infected patients. However, there are limitations in the use of these
counts as a disease monitor. Declines in CD4+ counts reflect damage already
inflicted on the immune system and are often a late manifestation of disease progression.
Furthermore, CD4+ cell counts do not appear to be a highly reliable indicator
of the effectiveness of antiviral therapy. Small increases in CD4+ cell counts
are not necessarily associated with reduced disease progression and/or improved survival.
By contrast, progressively increasing quantities of virus in the plasma have been shown to
be an indication of disease progression and, in patients currently on antiviral therapy,
could indicate the emergence of drug-resistant strains.
VIRAL MARKERS
Methods to quantitate plasma levels of virus
appear to be a more direct measure of therapeutic effectiveness than changes in CD4+
cell counts. These quantitative measures include both plasma p24 antigemia and direct
measurements of plasma viral RNA. Changes in the level of circulating virus occur rapidly
with the institution of effective therapy and often rise dramatically with the emergence
of resistant strains.
p24 Antigen
The p24 antigen quantitates the level of
circulating HIV core protein, a product of the Gag gene. Tests for this antigen have been
occasionally useful in detecting infection prior to seroconversion. However, this is of
extremely limited usefulness as recent studies have shown that the median time to
seroconversion, using the current HIV 1/2 test, is approximately 33 days. P24 antigen
determinations would only reduce this interval by 2 to 5 days.
As a means of monitoring therapy, the p24 antigen assay has been of
limited value because of its lack of sensitivity. The enzyme immunoassay detects antigen
early in infection when the viral load is high. Shortly after seroconversion though, the
p24 antigen level falls below detectable levels and remains undetectable until the late
stages of the disease. In the pre-terminal stages, high levels are again detected in the
plasma.
The lack of sensitivity appears to be partially due to the presence of
variable amounts of HIV antigen bound to antibody and thus present as immune complexes.
Recently, methods to dissociate immune complexes before assaying for p24 antigen have been
developed and appear to greatly enhance the sensitivity of this assay. The antigen level
can now be quantitated in up to 60% of infected patients including those in the
asymptomatic phase of the illness. Despite this increased sensitivity, quantitation of p24
antigen as a means of monitoring therapy remains controversial. There are conflicting
reports as to the relationship between observed antigen levels and disease progression.
Viral Quantitation
The most sensitive indicator of an antiviral
response is a change in the quantity of replicating virus. Previously, these measurements
depended upon time-consuming and nonstandardized viral cultures. Except for research
purposes, these assays were not clinically available. With recent technological
advancements, it is now possible to directly quantitate plasma levels of HIV RNA; this
provides clinicians with a sensitive measure of the levels of replicating virus.
An important distinction must be made between identifying HIV proviral
DNA and HIV RNA. PCR testing for HIV proviral DNA is a very sensitive test for recognizing
early infection and for identifying infected neonates born to seropositive mothers. It is
of limited use as a therapy monitoring tool. The HIV DNA assay detects integrated, often
latent virus rather than replicating virus. All infected individuals will have a positive
test. By contrast, HIV RNA quantitation by either polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or
branched-DNA assay provides a direct assessment of replicating virus and thus is more
likely to reflect prognosis and response to therapy. For example, high titers after
seroconversion have been found to predict more rapid disease progression. Recent studies
have also shown that high plasma viral levels are associated with transmission from a
pregnant mother to her newborn child. HIV viral RNA may be an important criteria in
selecting patients who would benefit most from early treatment and in guiding therapeutic
regimens for patients on treatment. Decreasing titers are indicative of a successful
response to therapy and are usually followed by a gradual improvement in immune status
including increases in CD4+ cell counts. By contrast, increasing viral titers in a treated
patient are suggestive of emergence of drug-resistant stains. The increase in viral titers
are often followed weeks later by clinical deterioration.
Central Blood Bank's Molecular Diagnostics Laboratories will be
offering a panel of three tests, Quantitative HIV-RNA, immune complex dissociated p24
antigen levels, and CD4+ counts to clinicians as a means of following
HIV-infected patients.
Copies of the Transfusion Medicine Update can be
obtained by contacting
Deb Small - (412) 209-7320;
email: dsmall@itxm.org
Copyright © 1994, Institute For Transfusion Medicine
|