September, 1994


HIV Therapy Monitoring

Hawazin Faruki, Dr. P.H., Scientific Director, Molecular Diagnostics Reference Laboratory


INTRODUCTION

More than one million people in the United States and in excess of 14 million people worldwide are infected with the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Many of those infected are in an asymptomatic phase of the illness; this latent period has a median duration of 10 years. However, with rare exceptions, all individuals who are infected will ultimately develop a severe immunodeficiency which predisposes them to both opportunistic infections and certain types of neoplasms.

Recent studies have shown that there is an intimate relationship between viral burden and disease progression. The initial infection is usually associated with a high level of viral replication; this occurs in both the blood and lymphoid tissues. One consequence of this initial viremic state is the development of a mononucleosis-like syndrome two-to-four weeks after initial infection. This viremic state is generally of short duration. Specific cellular and humoral immune responses are elicited which cause a dramatic reduction in the levels of free virus in the plasma. Unfortunately, these immune responses are insufficient to completely control viral replication. Recent studies suggest that there is continuous proliferation of virus, particularly in lymph nodes. The continuous viral replication results in gradual damage to the host's immune system as manifested by the progressive depletion of peripheral blood CD4+ T cells. Once a critical threshold of immune system damage is reached, usually a CD4+ cell count of less than 200/mm3, the individual becomes highly vulnerable to opportunistic infections or development of neoplasms such as Kaposi's sarcoma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Three drugs aimed at arresting HIV-1 replication, Zidovudine (AZT), Didanosine (DDI), and Zalcitabine (DDC) have been approved for the treatment of HIV infection. All three are inhibitors of the viral enzyme reverse transcriptase. This enzyme serves to copy the viral RNA into DNA which is subsequently integrated into the cells own DNA. Unfortunately, all three drugs are virostatic, not viricidal. A serious but common problem associated with reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapies is the emergence of drug-resistant isolates. Many other antiviral agents are currently under investigation including other reverse transcriptase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, and inhibitors of regulatory proteins such as TAT. Their long-term effectiveness is now being assessed.

The clinician treating an AIDS patient is faced with a number of questions -- how to determine when therapy should be instituted, how to monitor its effectiveness, and when to change therapies because of the emergence of drug-resistant virus? Traditionally, both CD4+ cell counts and changes in the clinical status have been used to monitor infected patients. Recent studies have questioned the adequacy of these markers and suggest that viral markers may provide additional useful information.

IMMUNOLOGIC MARKERS

There is little doubt that the course of HIV infection is associated with a progressive depletion of CD4+ cells. Absolute CD4+ cell counts have been the most widely used clinical parameter for monitoring HIV-infected patients. However, there are limitations in the use of these counts as a disease monitor. Declines in CD4+ counts reflect damage already inflicted on the immune system and are often a late manifestation of disease progression. Furthermore, CD4+ cell counts do not appear to be a highly reliable indicator of the effectiveness of antiviral therapy. Small increases in CD4+ cell counts are not necessarily associated with reduced disease progression and/or improved survival. By contrast, progressively increasing quantities of virus in the plasma have been shown to be an indication of disease progression and, in patients currently on antiviral therapy, could indicate the emergence of drug-resistant strains.

VIRAL MARKERS

Methods to quantitate plasma levels of virus appear to be a more direct measure of therapeutic effectiveness than changes in CD4+ cell counts. These quantitative measures include both plasma p24 antigemia and direct measurements of plasma viral RNA. Changes in the level of circulating virus occur rapidly with the institution of effective therapy and often rise dramatically with the emergence of resistant strains.

p24 Antigen

The p24 antigen quantitates the level of circulating HIV core protein, a product of the Gag gene. Tests for this antigen have been occasionally useful in detecting infection prior to seroconversion. However, this is of extremely limited usefulness as recent studies have shown that the median time to seroconversion, using the current HIV 1/2 test, is approximately 33 days. P24 antigen determinations would only reduce this interval by 2 to 5 days.

As a means of monitoring therapy, the p24 antigen assay has been of limited value because of its lack of sensitivity. The enzyme immunoassay detects antigen early in infection when the viral load is high. Shortly after seroconversion though, the p24 antigen level falls below detectable levels and remains undetectable until the late stages of the disease. In the pre-terminal stages, high levels are again detected in the plasma.

The lack of sensitivity appears to be partially due to the presence of variable amounts of HIV antigen bound to antibody and thus present as immune complexes. Recently, methods to dissociate immune complexes before assaying for p24 antigen have been developed and appear to greatly enhance the sensitivity of this assay. The antigen level can now be quantitated in up to 60% of infected patients including those in the asymptomatic phase of the illness. Despite this increased sensitivity, quantitation of p24 antigen as a means of monitoring therapy remains controversial. There are conflicting reports as to the relationship between observed antigen levels and disease progression.

Viral Quantitation

The most sensitive indicator of an antiviral response is a change in the quantity of replicating virus. Previously, these measurements depended upon time-consuming and nonstandardized viral cultures. Except for research purposes, these assays were not clinically available. With recent technological advancements, it is now possible to directly quantitate plasma levels of HIV RNA; this provides clinicians with a sensitive measure of the levels of replicating virus.

An important distinction must be made between identifying HIV proviral DNA and HIV RNA. PCR testing for HIV proviral DNA is a very sensitive test for recognizing early infection and for identifying infected neonates born to seropositive mothers. It is of limited use as a therapy monitoring tool. The HIV DNA assay detects integrated, often latent virus rather than replicating virus. All infected individuals will have a positive test. By contrast, HIV RNA quantitation by either polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or branched-DNA assay provides a direct assessment of replicating virus and thus is more likely to reflect prognosis and response to therapy. For example, high titers after seroconversion have been found to predict more rapid disease progression. Recent studies have also shown that high plasma viral levels are associated with transmission from a pregnant mother to her newborn child. HIV viral RNA may be an important criteria in selecting patients who would benefit most from early treatment and in guiding therapeutic regimens for patients on treatment. Decreasing titers are indicative of a successful response to therapy and are usually followed by a gradual improvement in immune status including increases in CD4+ cell counts. By contrast, increasing viral titers in a treated patient are suggestive of emergence of drug-resistant stains. The increase in viral titers are often followed weeks later by clinical deterioration.

Central Blood Bank's Molecular Diagnostics Laboratories will be offering a panel of three tests, Quantitative HIV-RNA, immune complex dissociated p24 antigen levels, and CD4+ counts to clinicians as a means of following HIV-infected patients.

 

Copies of the Transfusion Medicine Update can be obtained by contacting
Deb Small - (412) 209-7320;    email: dsmall@itxm.org

Copyright © 1994, Institute For Transfusion Medicine