LEUKOCYTE-REDUCED
TRANSFUSION THERAPY
Joseph E. Kiss, M.D., Medical Director
Blood Program and Apheresis/Outpatient
Services
INTRODUCTION
Large
numbers of donor leukocytes are present in cellular blood components,
which includes whole blood, packed red blood cells (RBC), and platelets.
These “passenger” leukocytes are responsible for several complications
associated with blood transfusions, including febrile non-hemolytic
transfusion reactions, platelet refractoriness due to alloimmunization to
human leukocyte antigens (HLA), and the transmission of certain
cell-associated viruses, especially cytomegalovirus (CMV). Advances in
biotechnology have resulted in the development of filters capable of
depleting residual leukocytes to levels below the specific thresholds
needed to prevent these complications.
FILTRATION TECHNOLOGY
Three “generations” of blood filters
are currently in use. The first-generation filters are the standard
170-micron clot screen filters attached to the administration set used for
all blood components. A second-generation filter, or microaggregate blood
filter (10 to 40 micron MABF), removes the granulocyte/platelet
microaggregates, which form in stored RBC units. Although useful, this
technology is much less efficient for white blood cell removal (less than
1 log) than the third generation filters (2 to 3 log removal) currently
available. The ultrafine synthetic fibers incorporated into these newer
filters creates a meshwork that removes donor leukocytes by a combination
of barrier retention and direct adsorption. Recent American Association
of Blood Banks (AABB) Standards have established a maximum leukocyte
content for prevention of febrile transfusion reactions to be <5 x 106
WBCs/unit. If used according to the manufacturer’s directions,
these levels can be reliably achieved.
However,
technical difficulties in using the filters at the bedside, such as
employing excessively high flow rates or pressures or improper flushing of
the filters, can impair efficacy of leukocyte removal. This concern has
prompted some to perform filtration only in the blood bank, where standard
quality control procedures can be routinely maintained.
CLINICAL USAGE
Prevention of recurrent (i.e., two or more)
non-hemolytic febrile transfusion reactions is readily accomplished using
leukocyte-depleted blood components. Third-generation filtration has
largely supplanted the less efficient methods of leukocyte removal
formerly used such as cell washing, use of MABF’s, and centrifugation
(typically less than one log removal).
Alloimmunization to HLA
antigens is a major cause of refractoriness to platelet transfusion in
multi-transfused hematology/oncology patients. The development of HLA
antibodies is also problematic for certain organ transplant candidates
such as those in need of kidney or cardiac transplantation. In five
randomized trials using leukocyte-depleted red cells and platelets in
leukemia/oncology patients, the development of HLA antibodies was reduced
from 13 to 50 percent in control subjects to 6 to 20 percent in the
treatment groups. Thus, there was an overall 50 percent reduction in the
incidence of alloimmunization. At present, the decision to use filtered
blood products in the routine prevention of alloimmunization should be
based on the incidence and morbidity of this complication in defined
patient populations.
In general,
multi-transfused hematology/oncology patients and selected transplant
candidates are most likely to benefit.
Evidence is
mounting that current leukocyte filtration methods are very effective in
preventing transfusion-transmitted CMV infections. Like other major human
herpes viruses, CMV is found exclusively in leukocytes. To date, studies
that have examined the incidence of CMV transmission using filtered, CMV-untested
blood components have found no cases of CMV seroconversion or clinical
disease in over 184 patients. This can be compared with a frequency of
75/303 (25%) in control patients receiving standard blood components.
Results from a large
prospective study directly comparing CMV seronegative blood products with
filtered, CMV unscreened components are expected within the next year.
Until then, evidence of efficacy is sufficient to consider the use of
filtered RBC or platelets as an alternative to CMV-seronegative products
when such products are not available for transfusion. The major argument
against routine use of bedside filtration for this purpose is the
uncertainty of adequate leukocyte reduction as mentioned above.
POTENTIAL FUTURE APPLICATIONS
A recent study has
demonstrated that the immunosuppressive effects associated with blood
transfusion can be prevented by leukocyte depletion. This finding may
have important implications in regard to post-operative infections and the
risk of tumor recurrence after cancer surgery.
Evidence that allogeneic leukocytes can
stimulate HIV-1 replication and secondary dissemination in vitro
has prompted a clinical study as to whether leuko-depleted blood
transfusions can impact the clinical course of HIV in infected patients.
Lastly, a new method known as
pre-storage leukocyte filtration now permits 3 to 4-log leukocyte
reduction in a closed system, so that an inventory of leukocyte-reduced
red cells can be readily available for transfusion. There seems little
doubt that over the next few years the use of leukocyte reduced blood
components will expand as promising clinical studies are confirmed and as
technology improves.
Additional information about
Leuko-Reduced Transfusion Therapy can be obtained by contacting
Joseph E. Kiss, M.D.
Copies of the
Transfusion Medicine Update can be obtained by contacting Deborah
Small at (412) 209-7320 or
by e-mail:
dsmall@itxm.org.