NEW DIAGNOSTICS
FOR HEPATITIS C VIRUS
Hawazin Faruki, Dr.P.H., Scientific Director
INTRODUCTION
Hepatitis C virus is the primary etiologic
agent of parenterally transmitted non-A, non-B (NANB) hepatitis. The
infectious agent is an RNA virus belonging to the Flaviviridae family.
Current estimates suggest that there are approximately 150 to 170,000 new
cases per year in the United States. Groups at greatest risk include IV
drug users, recipients of transfusions, and health-care workers. In
random blood donors, the prevalence of HCV antibodies varies from 0.3 to
1.5 percent. Although screening of donors and specific antibody testing
have greatly reduced the incidence of transfusion-associated HCV, it is
estimated that the current risk if approximately 1:3,300 units.
Recent studies have defined clinical
features of HCV infection. It is spread primarily by the parenteral
route. Unlike Hepatitis B, sexual and maternal-fetal transmissions are
uncommon. The acute infection may be asymptomatic; less than 25 percent
develop overt hepatitis. However, chronic hepatitis occurs in 50 to 60
percent of those infected with HCV. This is often clinically manifested
by periodic increases in hepatocellular enzyme levels. Cirrhosis develops
in approximately 20 percent of those who are chronically infected; there
is generally a prolonged interval (15-20 years) between initial infection
and the development of this complication. Patients with chronic HCV
infection are also at increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Treatment of chronic active hepatitis due to HCV with alpha interferon may
be of benefit.
SEROLOGY
The
diagnosis of HCV infection primarily depends upon detecting circulating
antibodies to this virus. The first immunoassay, an EIA test which was
based on detecting an antibody to a single virally associated antigen, was
introduced in 1989. In 1992, this screening assay was replaced by a more
sensitive and specific second-generation EIA test, which utilizes multiple
target antigens. In addition, a recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-II)
test has been licensed as a supplemental test following EIA positive test
results.
Nevertheless, many discrepancies still exist between antibody test results
and the actual presence of the virus. The rate of false positive EIA-2
tests in a blood donor population may be as high as 70 percent.
Autoimmune conditions, recent influenza vaccination, and other causes may
result in false positive HCV EIA results. Many of these false positive
tests may be resolved by supplemental RIBA-II testing. In a subject with
a positive EIA-2 test, a negative RIBA-II test strongly suggests that the
former was falsely positive. These specimens (EIA-2 pos, RIBA-II neg) are
consistently negative for the presence of viral RNA.
Unfortunately, a significant number of EIA-positive specimens are not
adequately resolved by RIBA-II testing. Even in individuals with positive
EIA-2 tests confirmed by supplemental RIBA-II testing. HCV RNA may be
undetectable in up to 25 percent. These patients (EIA+ RIBA+) therefore
require additional testing for the presence of viral RNA by PCR to
document chronic infection. Finally, indeterminate RIBA-II results
following EIA-2 positive screening tests need to be resolved by specific
testing for viral RNA.
MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
The
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is an extraordinarily sensitive
molecular-based diagnostic test that has been recently adapted for
detecting hepatitis C viral RNA. By reverse transcription (RT), a DNA
copy of the RNA viral genome is synthesized. This DNA copy is then
amplified via the enzymatic technique of PCR. The sensitivity of the
RT-PCR reaction is approximately 1000 viral genomes/ml.
RT-PCR
can be helpful in the recognition of acute HCV disease prior to
seroconversion. Following seroconversion, it can be valuable in
differentiating acute resolving HCV disease from chronic HCV in which
viral RNA persists. (In resolved HCV infections, antibodies are lost very
slowly. It is estimated that the rate of antibody loss is only 0.6/100
patient years.)
In
non-A, non-B chronic hepatitis, testing for HCV RNA by PCR may be helpful
despite negative serology. False negative HCV EIA tests have been
identified. Viral HCV RNA can be detected by PCR in up to 10 percent of
non-A non-B hepatitis cases with negative HCV EIA. In immunosuppressed
patients, such as those undergoing organ or bone marrow transplant, false
negative antibody tests appear to be a common finding. Seroconversion
occurs in only 60 to 70 percent of transplant patients who acquire HCV
during transplantation.
QUANTITATIVE HCV-RNA
Once
the presence of chronic HCV infection has been documented by RT-PCR,
quantitation of viral load may provide clinically useful information.
Recent evidence suggests that this test may give prognostic information;
lower HCV-RNA levels appear to be associated with less symptomatic disease
wand with improved response rates to alpha interferon therapy. Higher
viral titers are associated with longer terms of infection indicating the
progressive nature of the disease. Patients with a higher viral loads
tend to have more profound changes in liver histopathology and are more
refractory to treatment.
Clinical studies indicate that interferon therapy is beneficial in
approximately 50 percent of chronically infected HCV patients. Long-term
response rates (follow-up >6 months post-therapy) are lower; about 25
percent remain HCV-RNA negative. Response rates may vary depending on
dosages given. Using quantitation, response to therapy can be monitored
directly by measuring viral titer.
